It’s here .. a Battle.net Authenticator for Windows!

And no, it’s not Blizzard’s. This is a custom, yet fully supporting Battle.net Authenticator to run on your PC.
Currently, this authenticator features the following:
- Full support for Battle.net accounts.
- Support for both EU and US.
- It’s always synced perfectly.
So, you don’t have to buy an authenticator, nor do you have to have your iPhone handy at all times to login to your account. You can now do all that, easily, and securely using this very authenticator. And of course, credtis to Kynox for his lib!
Read more…
Recently, there have been quite the rumours about CTM not being safe, being detectable, and the works:
Originally posted by PiroX:
New Detection Information:
Very important! CTM seems to be unsafe at the moment. Disable CTM (Click to move) in bot under Main
Detection Status
– Safe with memory reading (pvpTool without Mem options)
– CTM seems to be unsafe
– MemLooting seems to be safe
Let me clear one thing up for you (or remind you, perhaps?) PiroX’s pvpTool is written in AutoIt. AutoIt CAN NOT HOOK. Which means it has to resort to direct memory writes to a pulsed struct to achieve something like CTM. Now, wouldn’t it be down-right easy for Warden to determine if the stuff in the CTM struct originates from an engine call or from an external program? (The CTM actions are timestamped, mind you. And 9.99/10 people don’t timestamp when they remotely write to the CTM struct)
Long story short, if you hook, and you do it properly; you’ll probably be safe until they nail your hook. If you write to the struct? You may end up with a ban, who knows. Warden is packed since 3.3.5, and no one really knows what it does yet.
I’m glad Blizzard is back into the anti-cheating stuff, being a bad kid gets boring if no one is watching the playground.
Originally Posted by Ski
What does that even mean? How would “CTM” be detectable? Its an ingame option that thousands of people, botters and nonbotters alike, use.
Rofl. I assumed a moderator of the Buddy Team would know his stuff. I assumed wrong.